It’s rarely a
great idea to define characters by one trait, but Ron Howard’s Formula One
drama Rush actually makes the broad
strokes work by becoming a film about two radically different approaches to
racing and life. It’s not a remotely complex piece of work—Howard doesn’t make
too many of those—but it’s a good, engaging story slickly packaged by the
director into an efficient and constantly exciting drama. Add on two wonderful
lead performances by Chris Hemsworth and Daniel Brühl, and you’ve got a film
that works simply because everybody involved is doing their job at a high
level. There’s not a lot of mystery to what makes Rush tick.
Hemsworth and
Brühl play James Hunt and Niki Lauda, respectively. The former is a British
party boy who is just as reckless on the track as he is off of it. The latter,
meanwhile, approaches the sport with the ruthlessness of a scientist. He knows
everything that he needs to do to win, and he executes it almost perfectly
without flair or excessive risk. The first half of the film chronicles their
respective ascents into Formula One superstardom, while the second half focuses
exclusively on the 1976 season, as Hunt and Lauda battled for the World
Championship. Rush bounces back and
forth between their considerable professional and personal struggles, including
Hunt’s dramatic marriage to Suzy Miller (Olivia Wilde) and Lauda’s less exciting union with Marlene Knaus (Alexandra Maria Lara).
The racing
sequences in Rush are probably the
most superficially thrilling setpieces that Howard has created in a long time.
The film reminds us multiple times of the thrills and dangers of Formula One
racing, and Howard is able to convey that visually as well as through dialogue.
Much of the credit should also go to veteran screenwriter Peter
Morgan, who was able to take two characters who could have potentially been one
note and give their relationship/rivalry some real credibility. If anything,
Howard sometimes makes the dichotomy between the two a bit too broad, but
Morgan is careful not to be so plain. Their respective motivations don’t seem
to be driven by an invisible hand, which could have easily been the case. Rush isn’t the most substantial piece of
entertainment, but there’s not a whole lot wrong with it either.
Grade: B
No comments:
Post a Comment